A British woman who left London as a schoolgirl to join the Islamic State militia should not be allowed to return to the UK to contest the government's decision to revoke her citizenship, the country's Supreme Court has ruled.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
In its landmark ruling, the court also ruled out a direct request to reinstate her citizenship.
Shamima Begum, who was born in the UK, left London in 2015 at the age of 15 with two teenaged friends to join the group in the Syrian city of Raqqa and married an IS fighter.
In 2019, Begum was pregnant and in the Al Hol refugee camp in northeastern Syria, from where she asked to be allowed to return to the UK, arguing that the move would save her baby's life.
She said she had given birth to two other children who had already died.
Sajid Javid, interior minister at the time, however decided to strip her of her citizenship for security reasons, arguing she would not be stateless because she could claim Bangladeshi citizenship, the country where her parents were born.
The case raised controversy in the UK, especially after it became known that Begum's third child also died.
According to Begum's lawyers, she had no possibility of appealing the government's decision from the refugee camp, where she did not have access to a phone.
The government however argued her return constituted a public threat and this danger outweighed her claim to appealing the revocation of her citizenship.
The Supreme Court has now upheld this argument.
Australian Associated Press
